|
|
|
IDENTITY
CRISIS
February 28, 2003
Can you please refer no longer to the likes of Russell Coutts, Brad Butterworth
and the rest of the ex-Team NZ defectors as New Zealanders—they are now Swiss. Let's strip them of any references
to being Kiwis because as far as I'm concerned they lost that
right as soon as they sold their passports for a fat pay cheque.
[They] can spend the rest of their lives in Switzerland, sailing
around Lake Geneva and taking yodelling lessons in their new
country.
– Andrew Beale, Manurewa, Letter to the Editor,
NZ Herald, 19/20.2.200315
WHAT
DOES IT MEAN TO BE A NEW ZEALANDER IN 2003? What depths of
patriotism must we display to be a real Kiwi? To be a "K-1,
W-1, till the day we die?"
Is
Russell Coutts—who
achieved the not insignificant task of winning our nation
the Auld Mug twice over in the past decade—really,
as Mr. Beale states, a national traitor worthy of deportation?
Or are we, as Jim Belich recently described16,
suffering from the "Kiwi Curse": a "collective
mean streak, a propensity to spasms of narrow-mindedness,
the tall poppy syndrome, negative egalitarianism and voluntary
totalitarianism?"
Are
we a close-minded community esconced at the farflung bottom
of the South Pacific, or postmodern worldly world citizens
ready to take on the challenges of the new knowledge economy?
Do we really need to just get over ourselves? Or is it perhaps
time we made a concerted attempt to actually find out who
we really are?
In
the past two weeks here in Aotearoa NZ, two interesting events
have happened. Both are yet to play themselves out fully.
First
event: we've lost three races in the America's Cup final.
The first loss, a humiliating dunking for the Kiwi yacht with
a snapped mast adding insult to injury. The next two races,
much closer, but no less shameful given the context of the
first. Our nation's now going through a collective hand-wringing
at the prospect of losing the Cup. Just when we've finally
gotten over all the anti-Auckland Jafa hatred connected with
the Cup race17, we face the prospect of the golden
calf going offshore as the result of Russell Coutts—an
Aucklander!—doing
what Aucklanders do best: following the money trail, wherever
it might take them. Then, to cap it all off today, news that
all those black "Loyal" silver fern flags we've
been flying were actually Made in China!18 Oh,
and all the denial!
Second
event: the "Knowledge Wave" emerging leaders forum,
our nation's go at bringing together three or four hundred
of its leading lights to examine NZ's place in the world -
mostly economically, but also culturally.
Last
Wednesday, stuck at home with an unwell child, I switched
on the telly to find not much yachting but instead wall-to-wall
coverage of Knowledge Wave on Sky. So I tuned in.
Day
One was a good watch: I liked Jim Belich, was intrigued by
Mike Moore, and found Australian High Court Justice Michael
Kirby's speech heartfelt and important. That he talked with
casual regard about his past sexuality embroilings spoke volumes
about how our Australian neighbours have progressed on important
social issues. It's debatable, however, whether NZ has progressed
a similarly distance. I caught a snippet of an interview with
one of the newspaper-nominated emerging young leaders, who
rabbited on about how our economic decline was as a result
of the decline of Christian values in our society. The "Voice
of a New Generation." And, on video the next day, I watched
the audience squirm as slick American presenter Richard Florida
talked about the rise of the cultural class, and how he measures
its presence through a "Bohemian Index" and a "Gay
Index". Press coverage of Florida's speech similarly
dwelt unhealthily on the "gay" issue19,
which perhaps is a hint that our country, and indeed Auckland,
would likely rank low on such indicators. Personally, I think
Florida's a genius, and Kiwi economic boosters of big expensive
stadia, conference centres and museums would do well to listen
to him (Bob Harvey, are you out there?).
Day
Three's highlights, which I read online20, were
Saatchi's sage Kevin Roberts, and OECD expatriate francophone
Simon Upton. In my job with an environmental NGO back in San
Francisco, I became close friends with Simon Upton's former
PA, who had nothing but compliments for him, so my expectations
were high. On a break from his role running the OECD environment
programme in Paris, Mr. Upton indeed delivered. Here's a highlight:
Uniquely, New Zealand appears to be a haven of Celtic rurality, Nordic
efficiency and Californian hedonism parked at the end of the
earth. And isn't that just what the post-modern age is all
about? Hasn't e-connectedness given the future to clever,
responsive people wherever they are? Maybe.
World citizens, indeed. But how we reconciliate the
conservative Christian values of Celtic rurality with our
growing Polyfornian hedonist populace21 remains
unanswered.
One of the more intriguing theories put forward by
Mr. Upton was that of drawing upon overseas Kiwis to try and
make up for our smallness and our distance. This line of thought
is very similar to that of Kevin Roberts, who promotes this
very idea on his own (Saatchi-supported) website: nzedge.com.
Simon Upton had the following to say:
... there are estimated to be between 600,000 and 1 million Kiwis living
abroad, over 400,000 of them in Australia alone (including
probably enough Maori to justify a whole extra Maori seat).
The fact that they have left says nothing about their commitment
to New Zealand. If it comes to important national issues—including
some that might be the subject of referenda—can we and should
we connect with the opinions and views of up to 20% of our
population? In an age of e-connectedness and virtual everything,
I think we should be prepared to be very lateral about the
way we define our political community.
The
above statement encouraged me to do a rather delicate deconstruction
of his statement.
Question
1: What about all those foreign-born people living here? Shouldn't
they be given the complementary right to politically connect
with their homelands? And what's the impact if we did so?
Let's look at the math.
-
At the 2001 Census, there
were 0.7 million NZers who were not born in NZ, out of a
total of 3.7 million. One in five (19%) of us were born
overseas, including: UK and Ireland (6%), Australia (2%),
the Pacific Islands (3%), and Asian countries (4%).
-
So one in five of us,
according to Mr. Upton, have the option of opting out: according
to his theory, their allegiances could theoretically remain
to any one of two hundred different home nations22.
Our four million Kiwi population fast shrinks to three.
Expecting Kiwis overseas to see themselves primarily
as NZers is shortsighted. Yes, I agree we can connect
with our overseas citizens, through business networks,
email, and social groupings, but we need to get over it
and realise that this place is our "Tu Mai",
our "Turangawaewae", our "Place to Stand".
Being here in NZ defines us as who we are now.
Ex-Pat Kiwis overseas are defined as Kiwis for who they
were in the past. Their
role in any national dialogue could perhaps continue,
via tools like email, but it is we the people here in
NZ who every day shape the future of this nation we live
in.
Only we can live in the now of here because
for us it moves forward with each passing moment.
Question 2: my bemusement at Mr. Upton's use of the
word "Kiwi" to describe NZ citizens abroad; not
"New Zealander"23. It's easy to define
a New Zealander, which is basically someone with NZ citizenship
and an NZ passport. You don't necessarily have to be born
here. My Grandfather was born in the USA, and moved here as
a boy, but all his life he was New Zealander through and through.
I myself was conceived in the US and born here, in Wairoa,
but I still define myself as a New Zealander despite these
complicating factors. The further permutations are endless;
Asian immigrants here who run their businesses back home;
second or third generation British people going back on child-of-citizen
visas or passports. All New Zealanders.
Defining New Zealanders as "Kiwi" is
quite different. Kiwi connotes a psychological connection
to NZ, to this land, to this unique set of islands.
Kiwi is a Maori word, but free of the emotional trappings
(and mispronunciations) of other Maori words. Pakeha
and Maori, here and abroad, see themselves proudly as
Kiwis without a second thought. There's very little
handwringing about the use of the word "Kiwi"
as a descriptor for ourselves.
Kiwi is a cultural construct; and its
through a cultural framework that we should
be connecting with NZers overseas in future:
not a political one as Mr. Upton proposes.
Aotearoa NZ is Turangawaewae
for all of us who live here each day. It is
our place to stand in a world presently in social,
economic, cultural and environmental turmoil.
Through our collective past histories and our
multifarious connections with people, ideas,
communities, and media here and around the rest
of the world, Kiwis in Aotearoa NZ today have
taken on a panoply of postmodern identities.
Mr. Upton is right on this count.
But the notion that place is not important,
that Kiwis overseas, through their past emotional
connections with this place and its people—now made very distant—this notion is wrong.
Richard Florida in his speech emphasised this.
He spoke of the acolytes of the Internet with
their "death of space" dreams now
gone down the toilet. Place matters.
The spaces we live in and how we view them culturally
is critically important.
This place we live in is the one unique thing
we all share. From the day we arrived, Maori
mythologised Aotearoa and made it our own. Mountains
with wild and torrid romances. Taniwha to explain
a restless landscape; scars on hills, rivers
that flood and go wild. Peter Jackson continued
this tradition in his honourable portrayal of
our lands as a Middle Earth down under.
On the day I came home to NZ in 2001, Sir Peter Blake
was murdered by pirates in Brazil. Our hero was dead. Two
weeks later, I listened to his service over National Radio
as a friend and I drove across the Hobbiton plains of the
Waikato. And I was sad. I was sad that Peter Blake was gone,
and I was sad to hear he was to be buried in England. No Tangi.
And it felt palpable that this nation, and the people who
dwell here, still perhaps have great lessons to learn about
who we are.
IDENTITY CRISIS
Nuhaka, Aotearoa New Zealand
(28.2.2003)
NOTES:
(1) http://www.nzherald.co.nz/
(2) In his speech at the
"Knowledge Wave Leadership Forum" in Auckland, NZ,
19.2.2003.
(3) Team NZ last year undertook
a tour of rural NZ with the stated aim of "taking the
enthusiasm beyond Auckland."
(4) See: The Warehouse Loyal
to China? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/americascup/acstorydisplay.cfm?storyID=3197861
&thesection=sport&thesubsection=americascup&thesecondsubsection=general
(5) Gay Index used to rank
hottest cities: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3101675&thesection=ne
ws&thesubsection=general&reportid=812597
(6) http://www.knowledgewave.org.nz/
(7) Including pretty much
all those bohemian backpacker visitors to our shores. Oh,
and its worth mentioning that the Polyfornians in the Knowledge
Wave audience were few and far between (unless you count Dave
Dobbyn?).
(8) The same might go for
the children of these foreign-born residents, who could likely
visit their parent's home country regularly and have stronger
connections there than here.
(9) Andrew Beale uses "Kiwi"
and "NZer" the same as Simon. Perhaps the simple
solution for all of us would be to not strip Coutts of his
citizenship, but to individually take an oath never to call
him a Kiwi ever again??
|
|
|
ABOUT
THIS SITE
Leo
Koziol (Rakaipaaka, Kahungunu) writes on identity,
spirit, culture, politics, place and ecology in Aotearoa NZ in the
21st Century.
This website brings together for the first time all of Leo Koziol's
essays, originally posted to Scoop.co.nz
under the banner of Naked in Nuhaka.
Nuhaka is located on the East Coast of the
North Island of Aotearoa New Zealand.
NAKED
INDEX >
|
Uniquely, New Zealand appears to be a haven of Celtic
rurality, Nordic efficiency and Californian hedonism parked at the
end of the earth.
- Simon Upton, Knowledge Wave Conference 2003 |
|